This document is intended as a proof of concept to solicit feedback from others. This document is incomplete. This document undoubtedly has errors.
This document is intended to serve as a resource for instructors to assist in the preparation of courses on C++ in a variety of settings, including university, college, and industry environments. The main objectives of this document are as follows:
This document does not itself provide a curriculum for a single specific course, but is rather a set of guidelines that can be used to prepare curricula for a wide variety of courses that differ in focus and level of sophistication. (This said, however, some links to other documents with examples of curricula for specific courses may be included herein.)
[NOTE: This is following the same license model as the C++ Core Guidelines.] Copying, use, modification, and creation of derivative works from this project is licensed under an MIT-style license. A copy of the license is included in the section LICENSE.
All contributions to this project must be made in accordance with the license mentioned above. Contributors should familiarize themselves with the general organization of this document and learning outcomes. Some information on learning outcomes can be found in the references. The following document offers a concise introduction to learning outcomes:
The various concepts (i.e., ideas) to potentially be covered are partitioned into “Knowledge Areas”. A knowledge area is very broad in scope, covering a considerable range of topics. Each knowledge area, in turn, in comprised of a number of what are referred to as “knowledge units”. Knowledge units are narrower in scope than knowledge areas.
For each knowledge area, the scope of the area is first described and its constituent knowledge units are identified. Then, for each knowledge unit (within an area), learning outcomes are specified. In order to address a wide variety of courses on C++, the learning outcomes are partitioned across three main proficiency levels:
These proficiency levels target audiences with different background and learning objectives as specified in the following table: [NOTE: These definitions of proficiency levels are only a first attempt and will undoubtedly need further work.]
Proficiency Level | Approximate Description |
---|---|
basic | a relative newcomer to C++ that would like to be able to write relatively small and simple programs which rely mostly on libraries written by others |
intermediate | someone already familiar with rudimentary C++ that would like to be able to write more sophisticated programs/libraries with some larger or more complex components |
advanced | someone who is very experienced with C++ who would like to be able to better utilize the many more nuanced aspects of the language |
The remainder of this document is organized as follows. The various knowledge units are listed grouped by knowledge area. In cases where a knowledge unit might be classified into more than one area, the unit is listed under the area of most direct relevance. (In the case that a unit is equally relevant to multiple areas, the decision of which to select is made by a proverbial coin toss.) The order in which knowledge areas and units are presented are not meant to imply any order of coverage in a course. The order in which items are listed is essentially arbitrary.
So, in summary, we have the following organization:
In the sections that follow, the various knowledge areas and knowledge units are presented. There is one section per knowledge area. For each knowledge area, a table listing the various knowledge units is provided. The ID for a knowledge unit is linked to the detailed coverage of that unit that comes later in the document. In the table, a checkmark indicates that learning outcomes exist for the specific proficiency level. A dash indicates that no learning outcomes exist for the specfic proficiency level (simply because there are not any, not because the information is missing). In the case that the information for a knowledge unit is completely missing, a “🤢” symbol is used.
[NOTE: These topics are taken mostly from the SG20 GitHub repository. They are not intended to be complete in any sense. In fact, by gathering together all topics in one place where they are easily viewed, it is hoped that missing and unbalanced items will be more obvious.]
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Translation Units | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Headers | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Modules | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Name Mangling | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Phases of Translation | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Separate Compilation | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Linkage | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Preprocessor Metaprogramming | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Inclusion | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Macros | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Constant Objects | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Declarations and Definitions | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Selection Constructs (e.g., if, ternary) | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Looping Constructs (e.g., for, while, etc.) | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Calling Functions | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Parameter Passing (e.g., Passing By Value and Reference) | ? | ? | ? |
[func_args] | Default Arguments | ✓ | - | - |
[🤢] | Returning Multiple Values | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Overloading | ? | ? | ? |
[udl] | User-Defined Literals | ✓ | ✓ | - |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Special Member Functions | ? | ? | ? |
[copy_elision] | Copy Elision and Implicit Moving (e.g., RVO and NRVO, etc.) | - | ✓ | ✓ |
[🤢] | Types | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Conversions | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Constructors and Destructors | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Move/Copy Constructors and Assignment Operators | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Member Functions | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Sum Types | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | User-Defined Literals | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Special Member Functions | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Guidelines for Special Member Functions (e.g., Rule of Five, Rule of Zero) | ? | ? | ? |
[copy] | Copy Semantics | ✓ | ✓ | - |
[🤢] | Moving and Copying | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Lambdas | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Virtual Functions | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Run-Time Type Information | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Constant Expressions and Constant Evaluation | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | static_assert | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Concepts | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | SFINAE | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Template Metaprogramming | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Function Templates | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Requires Clauses | ? | ? | ? |
[req_expr] | Requires Expressions | ✓ | ✓ | - |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Classes of Errors | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | errno | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Error Codes | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Exception Handling | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Input/Output (I/O) | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Containers, Iterators, and Algorithms | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Graphical User Interfaces | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Software Build Tools | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Strategies for Handling Build Problems | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Source-Level Debuggers | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Code Sanitizers | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Test Frameworks | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | Debugging Strategies | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Compiler Toolchains | ? | ? | ? |
[🤢] | IDEs | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
ID | Unit | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced |
---|---|---|---|---|
[🤢] | Design by Contract | ? | ? | ? |
Note: 🤢 indicates no entry yet available
Note: The IDs and checkmarks (✓) are linked to the corresponding sections.
After completing this unit, the student should be able to:
explain what copy elision and implicit moving are and why they are beneficial;
explain what is meant by return value optimization (RVO) and named RVO (NRVO);
for certain common code patterns, be able identify whether copy, move, or copy elision takes place.
After completing this unit, the student should be able to:
identify the particular circumstances when copy elision is permitted (but not necessarily required) and when it is required;
in arbitrary code, be able to identify whether copy, move, or copy elision takes place.
Some common misunderstandings include the following:
Skeleton instructions are typeset in italic text.
Provides a short natural language abstract of the module’s contents. Specifies the different levels of teaching.
Level | Objectives |
---|---|
Foundational | understanding how and when are copies made |
Main | implementing user-defined copy operations |
Advanced | special cases: copy elision |
Why is this important? Why do we want to learn/teach this topic?
Copy semantics allows the user to define how objects of a class get replicated and interact on a value level.
Very brief introduction to the topic.
Explains when and how objects are copied.
A student is able to: * explain what a C++ type is? [C++ object model: types] * explain what an object is? [C++ object model: objects], [C++ object model: constant objects] * define and understand class invariants?
It helps when a student is able to: * use move semantics [C++ object model: move semantics] * explain special member functions [C++ object model: special member functions]
A list of things “a student should be able to” after the curriculum. The next word should be an action word and testable in an exam. Max 5 items.
A student should be able to:
* In other languages these differences are sometimes referred to as shallow and deep copy.
This section mentions subtle points to understand, like anything resulting in implementation-defined, unspecified, or undefined behavior.
char*
). These ownership problems can generally be solved by using types whose copy operations have the appropriate semantics, e.g., std::string
instead of char*
to hold string values.This section lists important details for each point.
std::unique_ptr
(has no copy)A student is able to: * identify special member functions [C++ object model: special member functions]
It helps when a student is able to: * use move semantics [C++ object model: move semantics] * explain the rule of zero [C++ object model: rule-of-zero] * explain the rule of five [C++ object model: rule-of-five]
A list of things “a student should be able to” after the curriculum. The next word should be an action word and testable in an exam. Max 5 items.
A student should be able to: * explain when they have to implement the copy operations for their own type * Copy constructor * Copy assignment operator * implement copy operations for their own types * Optional: explain when copying with basic and strong exception guarantees is useful
This section mentions subtle points to understand, like anything resulting in implementation-defined, unspecified, or undefined behavior.
std::auto_ptr
)This section lists important details for each point.
These are important topics that are not expected to be covered but provide guidance where one can continue to investigate this topic in more depth.
When can copies be elided and when does the standard guarantee copy elision. References: * Abseil tip of the Week #166 * cppreference - Copy elision
Skeleton instructions are typeset in italic text.
Provides a short natural language abstract of the module’s contents. Specifies the different levels of teaching.
Level | Objectives |
---|---|
Foundational | using and understanding UDLs |
Main | implementing your own UDLs |
Advanced |
Advanced use (“{}, {}!”_fmt(“Hello”, “World”) )
|
Why is this important? Why do we want to learn/teach this topic?
std::string
: "Hello, world!"s
std::chrono
: 3h + 10m + 5s
Very brief introduction to the topic.
12m + 17s
is terse, expressive and type safe.A student: * knows how to form numeric literals, e.g., 1.5f
means a float
of value 1.5
. * is familiar with the major C++ types: * bool
(Boolean type) * int
(Integer type) * double
(Floating-point type) * std::string
(Text type) * std::vector
(Collection type) * knows that namespaces exist, and namespace std
. * knows what using-declarations and using-directives are. [C++ object model: declarations]
A list of things “a student should be able to” after the curriculum. The next word should be an action word and testable in an exam. Max 5 items.
A student should be able to:
using namespace std::string_literals
[1]."blah"s
as well as with std::string{"blah"}
.std::literals
.[1]: explain that it’s okay to use a using-directive to “activate” UDLs.
This section mentions subtle points to understand, like anything resulting in implementation-defined, unspecified, or undefined behavior.
This section lists important details for each point.
A list of things “a student should be able to” after the curriculum. The next word should be an action word and testable in an exam. Max 5 items.
A student should be able to:
This section mentions subtle points to understand, like anything resulting in implementation-defined, unspecified, or undefined behavior.
No caveats at present. #### Points to cover
This section lists important details for each point.
No caveats at present. ### Advanced {#udl-advanced}
These are important topics that are not expected to be covered but provide guidance where one can continue to investigate this topic in more depth.
Skeleton instructions are typeset in italic text.
Functions in C++ may be overloaded with different numbers and types of parameters. It may be of value to specify default arguments for some number of parameters, to allow a caller to avoid specifying arguments that rarely change, or to enable expanding the set of parameters while maintaining backward compatibility with existing callers.
Level | Objectives |
---|---|
Foundational | Define and use functions with default arguments |
Main | |
Advanced | refinement of default arguments through multiple declarations |
Default arguments allow the omission of arguments with obvious or common values. Also may be utilized to extend an existing function signature without forcing changes to existing calling code.
Explain how default arguments work and how to define them.
A student is able to:
A student should be able to:
A student should be able to:
Subsequent redeclarations of the same function may add default argument values, which are then usable by callers. Though a single parameter cannot be given a default argument twice in the same translation unit, it is legal, though ill-advised, to give the same function different default arguments in different translation units.
Level | Objectives |
---|---|
Foundational | Define and use requires-expressions to check satisfaction of expressions by given parameters |
Main | Define and use requires-expressions to check properties of expressions |
Advanced |
Requires-expressions allow a developer to perform compile-time evaluation on the validity of other expressions. These are fundamental to the ability to write concepts. [Compile-time programming: concepts]
Requires-expressions are compile-time predicates which evaluate to true when their specified set of expressions are all valid for a given set of inputs.
A student is able to:
It is helpful if:
A student should be able to:
if constexpr
conditionTo require that expressions, which evaluate to a boolean value like sizeof(t) == 4
, evaluate to true
a nested-requirement is needed (e.g., requires sizeof(t) == 4;
). Omitting the requires
results in a simple-requirement, which is satisfied based purely on syntactic validity, not on the result of the operation.
requires
and primarily used to check the result of an expression computable by the compiler, including concepts or other requires-expressions.typename
and used to verify the existence of a type with a particular identifier.requires requires
and show how to ever avoid writing it by using a concept. [Compile-time programming: concepts]noexcept
A student is able to:
A student should be able to:
noexcept
ness of an expression.noexcept
, by using a trailing noexcept
keyword. ``` struct S { void foo() noexcept {} void bar() {} };static_assert(requires(S s) { { s.foo() } noexcept; } ); // Succeeds. s.foo() is noexcept static_assert(requires(S s) { { s.bar() } noexcept; } ); // Fails. s.bar() is not noexcept ``* If the return-type-requirement of a compound-requirement is a concept, that concept is given the resulting type as the first parameter, followed by the specified parameters in the compound-requirement.
{ ++x } -> Cwould substitute
C<decltype((++x)), int>` and check that concept C is satisfied for those parameters.
[NOTE: Anyone have any suggestions of items to add here?] The following are examples of curricula for course on C++: …
D. Kennedy, A. Hyland, and N. Ryan. Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: A Practical Guide, 2007. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238495834_Writing_and_Using_Learning_Outcomes_A_Practical_Guide.
B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company, 1956.
Bloom’s Taxonomy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_taxonomy.
Effective Use of Performance Objectives for Learning and Assessment (For Use With Fink’s and Bloom’s Taxonomies), University of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Teaching and Educational Development, http://ccoe.rbhs.rutgers.edu/forms/pdf/EffectiveUseofLearningObjectives.pdf.
[NOTE: This license is copied from the C++ Core Guidelines.]
Copyright (c) Standard C++ Foundation and its contributors Standard C++ Foundation grants you a worldwide, nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual license to copy, use, modify, and create derivative works from this project for your personal or internal business use only. The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the project. This license does not grant permission to use the trade names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the licensor, except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the origin of the project. Standard C++ Foundation reserves the right to accept contributions to the project at its discretion. By contributing material to this project, you grant Standard C++ Foundation, and those who receive the material directly or indirectly from Standard C++ Foundation, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable, transferrable license to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute your contributed material and such derivative works, and to sublicense any or all of the foregoing rights to third parties for commercial or non-commercial use. You also grant Standard C++ Foundation, and those who receive the material directly or indirectly from Standard C++ Foundation, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license under your patent claims that directly read on your contributed material to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell and import or otherwise dispose of the material. You warrant that your material is your original work, or that you have the right to grant the above licenses. THE PROJECT IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE PROJECT. If you believe that anything in the project infringes your copyright, please contact us at admin@isocpp.org with your contact information and a detailed description of your intellectual property, including a specific URL where you believe your intellectual property is being infringed.
For a complete list of contributors, please refer to the repository containing this document on GitHub.
See the file named TODO.txt (in the project’s Git repository) for more details.